Weird. The people who actually dealt with the problem definitely didn't feel like it was a "tourist event". Their labeling is most definitely more accurate.
But those there contradict the narrative being told, therefore everyone who was there is lying if they don’t agree with the narrative.
I mean, I watched it happen live, from my couch, and if that was a peaceful tour, the LA riots were just a street carnival.
yet you offer no (zero/zip/nada) criticism. It seems that you, like the rest of the Dossier/Russia loyalists have a very selective attack/defense of messengers.
As for the testimony, I find it sad, deflating, troublesome, concerning, dangerous and ultimately dishonest. I fully understand this is not a court but a political stage, but that shouldn't give free license to be a political pawn. There remains a gap (OK, Gulf) between the End of Days testimony and the actual charges that a dedicated DOJ has been able to secure. Can you imagine why?
Weird. The people who actually dealt with the problem definitely didn't feel like it was a "tourist event". Their labeling is most definitely more accurate.
But those there contradict the narrative being told, therefore everyone who was there is lying if they don’t agree with the narrative.
I mean, I watched it happen live, from my couch, and if that was a peaceful tour, the LA riots were just a street carnival.
I'm kinda thinking that if the Chauvin legal team got to pick the court, judge, jury, and witnesses for his trial you wouldn't be a dedicated believer in the verdict....
yet you offer no (zero/zip/nada) criticism. It seems that you, like the rest of the Dossier/Russia loyalists have a very selective attack/defense of messengers.
As for the testimony, I find it sad, deflating, troublesome, concerning, dangerous and ultimately dishonest. I fully understand this is not a court but a political stage, but that shouldn't give free license to be a political pawn. There remains a gap (OK, Gulf) between the End of Days testimony and the actual charges that a dedicated DOJ has been able to secure. Can you imagine why?
yet you offer no (zero/zip/nada) criticism. It seems that you, like the rest of the Dossier/Russia loyalists have a very selective attack/defense of messengers.
As for the testimony, I find it sad, deflating, troublesome, concerning, dangerous and ultimately dishonest. I fully understand this is not a court but a political stage, but that shouldn't give free license to be a political pawn. There remains a gap (OK, Gulf) between the End of Days testimony and the actual charges that a dedicated DOJ has been able to secure. Can you imagine why?
You think the police officers are lying?
Something about your short reply to that wall of text made me laugh.
yet you offer no (zero/zip/nada) criticism. It seems that you, like the rest of the Dossier/Russia loyalists have a very selective attack/defense of messengers.
As for the testimony, I find it sad, deflating, troublesome, concerning, dangerous and ultimately dishonest. I fully understand this is not a court but a political stage, but that shouldn't give free license to be a political pawn. There remains a gap (OK, Gulf) between the End of Days testimony and the actual charges that a dedicated DOJ has been able to secure. Can you imagine why?
You think the police officers are lying?
His lawyer does and I agree with his lawyer, so yes. You've been on this train of dishonesty to nowhere for years now. Has it ever crossed your mind to check out or are you living some Hotel California thing?
yet you offer no (zero/zip/nada) criticism. It seems that you, like the rest of the Dossier/Russia loyalists have a very selective attack/defense of messengers.
As for the testimony, I find it sad, deflating, troublesome, concerning, dangerous and ultimately dishonest. I fully understand this is not a court but a political stage, but that shouldn't give free license to be a political pawn. There remains a gap (OK, Gulf) between the End of Days testimony and the actual charges that a dedicated DOJ has been able to secure. Can you imagine why?
His lawyer does and I agree with his lawyer, so yes. You've been on this train of dishonesty to nowhere for years now. Has it ever crossed your mind to check out or are you living some Hotel California thing?
Can I get a link to where his lawyer says he is lying?
Lol. This does absolutely nothing except grandstand.
These people had concealed carry permits so logic would say they likely had at least one firearm, yet none of them thought to bring one to the planned overthrow of the US government?
They still have their guns, they are just not legally allowed to conceal carry them…and we all know that alone will stop everyone from carrying a gun.
Lol. This does absolutely nothing except grandstand.
These people had concealed carry permits so logic would say they likely had at least one firearm, yet none of them thought to bring one to the planned overthrow of the US government?
They still have their guns, they are just not legally allowed to conceal carry them…and we all know that alone will stop everyone from carrying a gun.
No point in offering reality to him, he's completely destroyed. Diaper rash creme would serve him better.