Post by Axel Rosenberg on Apr 20, 2022 7:36:23 GMT -8
In the 80s right wing, christian shit-heads claimed Disney promoted witchcraft and Satanism. Now Qtinley shit-heads claim Disney promotes pedophilia. The right wing shit-heads have gotten even more stupid.
Last Edit: Apr 20, 2022 7:36:37 GMT -8 by Axel Rosenberg
"In exchange, the counties would collect the tax revenue that Disney currently pays itself."
Did I overlook mention of the incoming tax revenue for the counties?
I read an article that the special district operates at an annual loss of a few million dollars. Disney can operate it that way because it can cover the shortfall between taxes and expenditures for the district. Disbanding the district would mean the localities that annex the areas would then have to cover that shortfall.
Of course, that is all dependent on if the accounting is above board or if it's "Hollywood accounting"
"In exchange, the counties would collect the tax revenue that Disney currently pays itself."
Did I overlook mention of the incoming tax revenue for the counties?
I read an article that the special district operates at an annual loss of a few million dollars. Disney can operate it that way because it can cover the shortfall between taxes and expenditures for the district. Disbanding the district would mean the localities that annex the areas would then have to cover that shortfall.
Of course, that is all dependent on if the accounting is above board or if it's "Hollywood accounting"
"Of course, that is all dependent on if the accounting is above board or if it's "Hollywood accounting"
My initial thought was, of course they're going to operate it as a loss.
snerb Where are we going, and why am I in a hand basket?
"Of course, that is all dependent on if the accounting is above board or if it's "Hollywood accounting"
My initial thought was, of course they're going to operate it as a loss.
Too much panic incited by the View in defense of pedophilia.
Local gov't will simply raise taxes on Disney specific businesses to cover costs. Gov'ts raising targeted taxes isn't (and I'm not making this up) new. That is what Disney has long opposed, paying "its fair share".
Disney can then choose to suck up the cost or pass it along to its customers.
The state has no obligation to subsidize Disney if they believe it is a poor value for residents.
I read an article that the special district operates at an annual loss of a few million dollars. Disney can operate it that way because it can cover the shortfall between taxes and expenditures for the district. Disbanding the district would mean the localities that annex the areas would then have to cover that shortfall.
Of course, that is all dependent on if the accounting is above board or if it's "Hollywood accounting"
"Of course, that is all dependent on if the accounting is above board or if it's "Hollywood accounting"
My initial thought was, of course they're going to operate it as a loss.
Yep. When I was a landlord I operated as a loss every year on paper and cleaned up come tax time.
I remember getting lectured by garydog that I was a failure because I operated at a loss.
I don't understand your point. Does lying become more acceptable at an older age?
Pedo becomes more acceptable with strange, unstable and young people. Most adults (at least men) would kick the shit out of someone taking about sex things with their young children. That's why I'm trying to see where you fit in.
Of course you could just claim that you're a dumbass.
In the 80s right wing, christian shit-heads claimed Disney promoted witchcraft and Satanism. Now Qtinley shit-heads claim Disney promotes pedophilia. The right wing shit-heads have gotten even more stupid.
we boycotted disney in the 80s/90s in our family because of "gay day" at the Disney resorts