Big rant, but you didnt provide any of the information I asked for.
I provided MUCH.
You respond with N-O-T-H-I-N-G....
Which leads me to believe that you don't even believe the nonsense you're spewing yourself.
I asked for a list of crimes committed, you provided nothing. I asked for the evidence, you provided nothing (except for typing evidence in bold letters).
If you've "seen (ALL OF) the transcripts", you should already know exactly what I'm talking about. There were intercepted conversations among those involved during this "investigation" that agreed they didn't think Flynn lied.
Are you truly unaware of all the details? I wouldn't be surprised. I suggest you do some homework on your own though.
Shit's about to hit the fan for the entire DNC.
Don't ever say I didn't tell you so.
Forgot to add to my last post:
Can you provide a link to where I can see what it is that you believe supports your statement?
Comey Told Congress FBI Agents Didn't Think Flynn Lied
LOL @ this thread. Eddie refusing to back up anything he says with anything resembling stats (as always) and Tinley going all in on a fuck up he made in another thread... Just like Trump, when he makes a mistake he tries to pretend it was intentional and that it's somehow so genius that the rest of us just can't comprehend. Mueller broke both of them.
LOL @ this thread. Eddie refusing to back up anything he says with anything resembling stats (as always) and Tinley going all in on a fuck up he made in another thread... Just like Trump, when he makes a mistake he tries to pretend it was intentional and that it's somehow so genius that the rest of us just can't comprehend. Mueller broke both of them.
LOL @ this thread. Eddie refusing to back up anything he says with anything resembling stats (as always) and Tinley going all in on a fuck up he made in another thread... Just like Trump, when he makes a mistake he tries to pretend it was intentional and that it's somehow so genius that the rest of us just can't comprehend. Mueller broke both of them.
Meuller surely did break someone. I astutely noted it thus-
Two quick points-
1. 31% is a shovel. The Home Depot shovel. They made up their mind election night when they figured out Hillery was going to lose and they will never accept America. The real tragedy is the number is 31% and not .0001%.
2. The 25 questions will only further confuse the 31%. Everyone else wants to know how and why we went through this nonsense. The 31% will be befuddled as to how and why the facts keep contradicting their hopes and dreams.
Which leads me to believe that you don't even believe the nonsense you're spewing yourself.
I asked for a list of crimes committed, you provided nothing. I asked for the evidence, you provided nothing (except for typing evidence in bold letters).
I went into detail about the evidence that's already on the table, which you willfully chose to ignore.
That can only mean one thing; you weren't really looking to have an honest and open conversation to begin with, which is the way of the troll.
I asked for a list of crimes committed, you provided nothing. I asked for the evidence, you provided nothing (except for typing evidence in bold letters).
I went into detail about the evidence that's already on the table, which you willfully chose to ignore.
That can only mean one thing; you weren't really looking to have an honest and open conversation to begin with, which is the way of the troll.
Cheerio...
But you didnt do any of that. You wrote "evidence" in bold letters without actually providing any evidence. You also failed to list the crimes.
for what? List the crimes he committed and lay out all the evidence against him... in other words, apply the same standards to this as you applied to the Mueller investigation
Mueller "investigation"?
No.
That wasn't an investigation. That was a fishing expedition, right from the very beginning.
NOTHING about the so called "investigation" was handled properly, or under ANY otherwise normal protocols previously used for starting any legitimate case in the first place. Not to mention against the POTUS. This was a complete and utter mockery of our Judicial System at the highest levels.
There's evidence they knew the "dossier" was nothing but unverified tabloid garbage, and also evidence they knew it was bought and paid for by Hillary and the DNC.
What's that matter though, when all the top "investigators" promoted to handle things were for Hillary and donors to the DNC? lol
There's also evidence showing they admitted there was "no there-there" to begin with, and also evidence they admitted they didn't think Flynn lied.
ALL of THAT is ALREADY on the table. Not to mention Barr is now looking into the origins of this "investigation" to begin with.
Do your news sources not keep you up to date on those specific topics?
There's about to be a report dropped SOON from Horowitz, a.k.a. "The Comey Report". Let's see how that goes. I know they've already got enough to nail him, but they may want to hold off until the new investigation (into the conduct of the "investigators")is complete.
Either way, Comey is going to be held accountable at some point. Make no mistake about it. Mark my words.
So, wouldn't the judge that approved the Fisa warrants be in a lot of trouble for approving them? Should he be indicted as well?
That wasn't an investigation. That was a fishing expedition, right from the very beginning.
NOTHING about the so called "investigation" was handled properly, or under ANY otherwise normal protocols previously used for starting any legitimate case in the first place. Not to mention against the POTUS. This was a complete and utter mockery of our Judicial System at the highest levels.
There's evidence they knew the "dossier" was nothing but unverified tabloid garbage, and also evidence they knew it was bought and paid for by Hillary and the DNC.
What's that matter though, when all the top "investigators" promoted to handle things were for Hillary and donors to the DNC? lol
There's also evidence showing they admitted there was "no there-there" to begin with, and also evidence they admitted they didn't think Flynn lied.
ALL of THAT is ALREADY on the table. Not to mention Barr is now looking into the origins of this "investigation" to begin with.
Do your news sources not keep you up to date on those specific topics?
There's about to be a report dropped SOON from Horowitz, a.k.a. "The Comey Report". Let's see how that goes. I know they've already got enough to nail him, but they may want to hold off until the new investigation (into the conduct of the "investigators")is complete.
Either way, Comey is going to be held accountable at some point. Make no mistake about it. Mark my words.
So, wouldn't the judge that approved the Fisa warrants be in a lot of trouble for approving them? Should he be indicted as well?
The FISA judge or judges should definitely testify as to their role. That's where it gets tricky, because I'm under the impression that they're probably fairly used to signing off on just about anything. If it comes to a head, it wouldn't be a bad thing to implement a little FISA court reform.
But you didnt do any of that. You wrote "evidence" in bold letters without actually providing any evidence. You also failed to list the crimes.
I listed it all. You still choose to dance around it.
I'm nobody's personal errand boy willing to go out and gather links. I don't waste my time playing that game with people like you, nor do I feel like arguing. NOTHING I've said is new news, as it's all been out there for awhile now, but you're all like durr...I never heard about any of that...durr
There's evidence to prove they knew the "dossier" was nothing but unverified tabloid garbage, and evidence they knew it was bought and paid for by Hillary and the DNC. None of this stopped them from still presenting it in front of a judge as key "evidence" to open a bogus "investigation", that they themselves knew was bogus right from the start. Remember, "There is no there-there"? Just like there's also evidence that "investigators" never thought Flynn was lying, but didn't stop them from charging him still.
This was a fishing expedition right from the start, to find SOMETHING/ANYTHING to unseat a duly elected President.
NOTHING about the so called "investigation" was handled properly, or under ANY otherwise normal protocols previously used for starting any legitimate case in the first place. Not to mention against the POTUS. This was a complete and utter mockery of our Judicial System at the highest levels.
Everything I said there is evidence to back it up. It's been out there for awhile. Look it up for yourself if you don't believe me, or maybe somebody else will do it for you. It's out there. It's real. Heads WILL roll.
As for what the exact crimes are, I'm no prosecutor, so I won't speculate. Charges ARE coming though.
That wasn't an investigation. That was a fishing expedition, right from the very beginning.
NOTHING about the so called "investigation" was handled properly, or under ANY otherwise normal protocols previously used for starting any legitimate case in the first place. Not to mention against the POTUS. This was a complete and utter mockery of our Judicial System at the highest levels.
There's evidence they knew the "dossier" was nothing but unverified tabloid garbage, and also evidence they knew it was bought and paid for by Hillary and the DNC.
What's that matter though, when all the top "investigators" promoted to handle things were for Hillary and donors to the DNC? lol
There's also evidence showing they admitted there was "no there-there" to begin with, and also evidence they admitted they didn't think Flynn lied.
ALL of THAT is ALREADY on the table. Not to mention Barr is now looking into the origins of this "investigation" to begin with.
Do your news sources not keep you up to date on those specific topics?
There's about to be a report dropped SOON from Horowitz, a.k.a. "The Comey Report". Let's see how that goes. I know they've already got enough to nail him, but they may want to hold off until the new investigation (into the conduct of the "investigators")is complete.
Either way, Comey is going to be held accountable at some point. Make no mistake about it. Mark my words.
So, wouldn't the judge that approved the Fisa warrants be in a lot of trouble for approving them? Should he be indicted as well?
But you didnt do any of that. You wrote "evidence" in bold letters without actually providing any evidence. You also failed to list the crimes.
I listed it all. You still choose to dance around it.
I'm nobody's personal errand boy willing to go out and gather links. I don't waste my time playing that game with people like you, nor do I feel like arguing. NOTHING I've said is new news, as it's all been out there for awhile now, but you're all like durr...I never heard about any of that...durr
There's evidence to prove they knew the "dossier" was nothing but unverified tabloid garbage, and evidence they knew it was bought and paid for by Hillary and the DNC. None of this stopped them from still presenting it in front of a judge as key "evidence" to open a bogus "investigation", that they themselves knew was bogus right from the start. Remember, "There is no there-there"? Just like there's also evidence that "investigators" never thought Flynn was lying, but didn't stop them from charging him still.
This was a fishing expedition right from the start, to find SOMETHING/ANYTHING to unseat a duly elected President.
NOTHING about the so called "investigation" was handled properly, or under ANY otherwise normal protocols previously used for starting any legitimate case in the first place. Not to mention against the POTUS. This was a complete and utter mockery of our Judicial System at the highest levels.
Everything I said there is evidence to back it up. It's been out there for awhile. Look it up for yourself if you don't believe me, or maybe somebody else will do it for you. It's out there. It's real. Heads WILL roll. As for as what the exact crimes are, I'm no prosecutor, so I won't speculate. Charges ARE coming though.
I'd love to see some evidence that proves they knew the dossier was garbage when much of it turned out to be true. Everyone, including the Fisa Judge, knew the report was from a political opponent so nothing earth shattering or ground breaking about that. Got anything else?
So, wouldn't the judge that approved the Fisa warrants be in a lot of trouble for approving them? Should he be indicted as well?
The central judge is Rosemary Collyer. The NSA has determined that there was plenty wrong in the FISA warrants. They worked with her and released a highly redacted report. Starting on page 82-
You start seeing problems like '85% of queries not compliant with minimum procedures". "unusually high error rate". "the following violations of the FBI minimum procedures merit discussion". "improper disclosure of raw information". "contractors had access to raw FISA information".
It goes on for pages.
We know there was problems both in getting the FISA warrants and in the "unmasking" of American citizens. We need to know who and why. I expect movement soon.
But you didnt do any of that. You wrote "evidence" in bold letters without actually providing any evidence. You also failed to list the crimes.
I listed it all. You still choose to dance around it.
I'm nobody's personal errand boy willing to go out and gather links. I don't waste my time playing that game with people like you, nor do I feel like arguing. NOTHING I've said is new news, as it's all been out there for awhile now, but you're all like durr...I never heard about any of that...durr
There's evidence to prove they knew the "dossier" was nothing but unverified tabloid garbage, and evidence they knew it was bought and paid for by Hillary and the DNC. None of this stopped them from still presenting it in front of a judge as key "evidence" to open a bogus "investigation", that they themselves knew was bogus right from the start. Remember, "There is no there-there"? Just like there's also evidence that "investigators" never thought Flynn was lying, but didn't stop them from charging him still.
This was a fishing expedition right from the start, to find SOMETHING/ANYTHING to unseat a duly elected President.
NOTHING about the so called "investigation" was handled properly, or under ANY otherwise normal protocols previously used for starting any legitimate case in the first place. Not to mention against the POTUS. This was a complete and utter mockery of our Judicial System at the highest levels.
Everything I said there is evidence to back it up. It's been out there for awhile. Look it up for yourself if you don't believe me, or maybe somebody else will do it for you. It's out there. It's real. Heads WILL roll.
You really don't understand a lot of things. First of all, saying something is true doesn't make it "evidence". You need to show that it's true by giving a source for where that information came from. Otherwise I could just say, for instance:
"Trump has a tiny dick". I can easily back this up by stating that he shows many personality traits consistent with men who have tiny dicks. I read that in a very important study. There was also a porn star whom he allegedly fucked who came out and said that he has a tiny dick. Also, there is a picture online of his penis, proving that it's tiny. Don't believe me? Go look up pictures of his penis online, and go find the study done (can't remember where I read it or who wrote it) and go look up the porn star (don't remember her name) and the alleged affair.
If you are unwilling to accept my proof, you will understand why everyone here thinks you're an idiot and doesn't take you seriously.
You have literally provided no evidence at all... just your opinion on things you say you have read but can't quote or cite properly. And you've proven that you can't comprehend facts, given that you still believe that the Mueller Investigation completely exonerates your Orange Crush.
Your willingness to take Trump's word as gospel on every single issue, while thinking that Hilary and Obama deserve to fry for their crimes just shows how big a partisan hack you are.