The same FBI that thought Trump colluded with Russia?
Round & round you go, where you stop, nobody knows. lol. This is a prime example for everyone to see why I don't waste my time digging up links.
I believe there's actually transcripts either through text messaging or emails somewhere to prove this even further, so I don't think Comey had any choice but to admit what there was already evidence to prove. Please correct me if I'm wrong on that last point, EPIC Sir Tinley, if you don't mind.
I listed it all. You still choose to dance around it.
I'm nobody's personal errand boy willing to go out and gather links. I don't waste my time playing that game with people like you, nor do I feel like arguing. NOTHING I've said is new news, as it's all been out there for awhile now, but you're all like durr...I never heard about any of that...durr
There's evidence to prove they knew the "dossier" was nothing but unverified tabloid garbage, and evidence they knew it was bought and paid for by Hillary and the DNC. None of this stopped them from still presenting it in front of a judge as key "evidence" to open a bogus "investigation", that they themselves knew was bogus right from the start. Remember, "There is no there-there"? Just like there's also evidence that "investigators" never thought Flynn was lying, but didn't stop them from charging him still.
This was a fishing expedition right from the start, to find SOMETHING/ANYTHING to unseat a duly elected President.
NOTHING about the so called "investigation" was handled properly, or under ANY otherwise normal protocols previously used for starting any legitimate case in the first place. Not to mention against the POTUS. This was a complete and utter mockery of our Judicial System at the highest levels.
Everything I said there is evidence to back it up. It's been out there for awhile. Look it up for yourself if you don't believe me, or maybe somebody else will do it for you. It's out there. It's real. Heads WILL roll. As for as what the exact crimes are, I'm no prosecutor, so I won't speculate. Charges ARE coming though.
I'd love to see some evidence that proves they knew the dossier was garbage when much of it turned out to be true. Everyone, including the Fisa Judge, knew the report was from a political opponent so nothing earth shattering or ground breaking about that. Got anything else?
The same FBI that thought Trump colluded with Russia?
Round & round you go, where you stop, nobody knows. lol. This is a prime example for everyone to see why I don't waste my time digging up links.
I believe there's actually transcripts either through text messaging or emails somewhere to prove this even further, so I don't think Comey had any choice but to admit what there was already evidence to prove. Please correct me if I'm wrong on that last point, EPIC Sir Tinley , if you don't mind.
Why does it matter that there were individuals in the FBI who believed Flynn's lies at the time of talking to Flynn?
Flynn lied, FBI agents believed the lies, but found out later that Flynn was lying.... what exactly is the problem?
The central judge is Rosemary Collyer. The NSA has determined that there was plenty wrong in the FISA warrants. They worked with her and released a highly redacted report. Starting on page 82-
You start seeing problems like '85% of queries not compliant with minimum procedures". "unusually high error rate". "the following violations of the FBI minimum procedures merit discussion". "improper disclosure of raw information". "contractors had access to raw FISA information".
It goes on for pages.
We know there was problems both in getting the FISA warrants and in the "unmasking" of American citizens. We need to know who and why. I expect movement soon.
As do I, as do I.
Infact, I've already got my cup ready to catch the liberal tears. This is going to be fun.
First of all, saying something is true doesn't make it "evidence". You need to show that it's true by giving a source for where that information came from.
No. I need to do nothing of the sort.
Thankfully, Tinley's already been posting links to back up what should already be known, from a group that's been foaming at the mouth for two years straight over all of this.
People just want to play stupid. I don't play that game, but please do carry on my wayward son.
The same FBI that thought Trump colluded with Russia?
Round & round you go, where you stop, nobody knows. lol. This is a prime example for everyone to see why I don't waste my time digging up links.
I put it this way-
Two quick points-
1. 31% is a shovel. The Home Depot shovel. They made up their mind election night when they figured out Hillery was going to lose and they will never accept America. The real tragedy is the number is 31% and not .0001%.
2. The 25 questions will only further confuse the 31%. Everyone else wants to know how and why we went through this nonsense. The 31% will be befuddled as to how and why the facts keep contradicting their hopes and dreams.
It was, and remains powerfully accurate. They're not putting down their shovel.
I believe there's actually transcripts either through text messaging or emails somewhere to prove this even further, so I don't think Comey had any choice but to admit what there was already evidence to prove. Please correct me if I'm wrong on that last point, Sir Tinley, if you don't mind.
You are correct, but that don't mean shit. Hell, even after the Meuller report they won't let go of their shovels. They are in too deep.
Round & round you go, where you stop, nobody knows. lol. This is a prime example for everyone to see why I don't waste my time digging up links.
I believe there's actually transcripts either through text messaging or emails somewhere to prove this even further, so I don't think Comey had any choice but to admit what there was already evidence to prove. Please correct me if I'm wrong on that last point, EPIC Sir Tinley , if you don't mind.
Why does it matter that there were individuals in the FBI who believed Flynn's lies at the time of talking to Flynn?
Flynn lied, FBI agents believed the lies, but found out later that Flynn was lying.... what exactly is the problem?
this is a nothing burger that they think will result in handcuffs.....
this is a nothing burger that they think will result in handcuffs.....
Everyone loves a good nothing burger. I think we should let this one go on for, say 22 months? And if nothing comes of it, no big deal, we can just pretend something did?
this is a nothing burger that they think will result in handcuffs.....
Everyone loves a good nothing burger. I think we should let this one go on for, say 22 months? And if nothing comes of it, no big deal, we can just pretend something did?
The government needs checks and balances. Who decides what is a nothing burger unless you have a hint that wrong doing has occurred, you have leads, and investigate to find out if there is a nothing burger....?
Post by EPIC Sir Tinley on Apr 30, 2019 10:34:17 GMT -8
Apr 30, 2019 13:31:00 GMT -4 Eddie said:As do I, as do I.
Infact, I've already got my cup ready to catch the liberal tears. This is going to be fun.
I look at it somewhat different. I'm not a believer in wins, loses, paper crowns, or owning people. It just doesn't offer me anything of value. I don't even have friends or family on FaceBook to brag to.
Yes, there will be people broken intellectually and emotionally by the coming understanding of what happened and who was involved and what their legal situation becomes. That isn't something to celebrate. They will need costly help to regain normalcy. It will be a battle just getting them to put down their shovel and consider reality.
this is a nothing burger that they think will result in handcuffs.....
What's funny is that eddie and kegger are doing the same shit they were mocking the left for during the Mueller investigation. The fact that they don't see the hypocrisy is hilarious.
The fuck-up triple play.
As opposed to the Russian collusion investigation, there is actual known wrong doing to determine Who, What and Why.
I have not determined wrongdoing or called for jail. In fact, I've opposed jail for anything Hillery might be implicated for. I've specifically posted we need to know if there was incompetence, corruption or criminality and respond accordingly.
Both instances are consistent.
The hypocrisy you seek is those who demanded an endless Meuller look into any and all in a quest to find anything to take down Trump, and now want to close shop uninterested at all in gov't incompetence or abuse.
What's funny is that eddie and kegger are doing the same shit they were mocking the left for during the Mueller investigation. The fact that they don't see the hypocrisy is hilarious.
The fuck-up triple play.
As opposed to the Russian collusion investigation, there is actual known wrong doing to determine Who, What and Why.
I have not determined wrongdoing or called for jail. In fact, I've opposed jail for anything Hillery might be implicated for. I've specifically posted we need to know if there was incompetence, corruption or criminality and respond accordingly.
Both instances are consistent.
The hypocrisy you seek is those who demanded an endless Meuller look into any and all in a quest to find anything to take down Trump, and now want to close shop uninterested at all in gov't incompetence or abuse.
There was gross incompetence found on team Trump as detailed in the Mueller report.
There was ample evidence (Trump Tower, everyone on team trump lying about Russian contacts) that raised the suspcion enough to warrant an investigation; especially since wrong doing occurred, the hacking of the DNC.
We expect our system to investigate something like this. It is would be ridiculous not to simply because trumples give Trump the benefit of the doubt constantly. He has never earned it.
But you didnt do any of that. You wrote "evidence" in bold letters without actually providing any evidence. You also failed to list the crimes.
I listed it all. You still choose to dance around it.
I'm nobody's personal errand boy willing to go out and gather links. I don't waste my time playing that game with people like you, nor do I feel like arguing. NOTHING I've said is new news, as it's all been out there for awhile now, but you're all like durr...I never heard about any of that...durr
There's evidence to prove they knew the "dossier" was nothing but unverified tabloid garbage, and evidence they knew it was bought and paid for by Hillary and the DNC. None of this stopped them from still presenting it in front of a judge as key "evidence" to open a bogus "investigation", that they themselves knew was bogus right from the start. Remember, "There is no there-there"? Just like there's also evidence that "investigators" never thought Flynn was lying, but didn't stop them from charging him still.
This was a fishing expedition right from the start, to find SOMETHING/ANYTHING to unseat a duly elected President.
NOTHING about the so called "investigation" was handled properly, or under ANY otherwise normal protocols previously used for starting any legitimate case in the first place. Not to mention against the POTUS. This was a complete and utter mockery of our Judicial System at the highest levels.
Everything I said there is evidence to back it up. It's been out there for awhile. Look it up for yourself if you don't believe me, or maybe somebody else will do it for you. It's out there. It's real. Heads WILL roll.
As for what the exact crimes are, I'm no prosecutor, so I won't speculate. Charges ARE coming though.
But you didnt give any evidence. You said "there is evidence" without showing what that evidence is. It's the same thing people did with the Mueller investigation. Claiming there was plenty of evidence, but not showing what it is...
LOL. Thought you folks would find that funny. That's why I purposefully added that line..."Storm Is Coming".
You all know more about Q related shit than I do, so I love pulling your strings.
you probably know a lot more about Qanon than you think. A lot of shit that filters through the Qanon site goes through to what you post though.
Sure, there are lots of people who express the same opinions on certain topics and situations, but that doesn't necessarily mean they're associated or related in any way together. It happens to me a lot, where I'll see something going on, express my own personal opinion, only to turn around and see really big personalities on Twitter turn around and express the same exact viewpoint. It's actually not that unusual....
this is a nothing burger that they think will result in handcuffs.....
What's funny is that eddie and kegger are doing the same shit they were mocking the left for during the Mueller investigation. The fact that they don't see the hypocrisy is hilarious.
They simply don't see the hypocrisy. They believe that since the "libs" already acted this way means they are justified in their actions, regardless of how much they contradict their own logic as long as they can "own the libs".
Stupid will just be stupid no matter how you call them out on their bs.
"Too often, we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." - JFK
"First Thoughts are the everyday thoughts. Everyone has those. Second Thoughts are the thoughts you think about the way you think. People who enjoy thinking have those. Third Thoughts are thoughts that watch the world and think all by themselves. They’re rare, and often troublesome."
They simply don't see the hypocrisy. They believe that since the "libs" already acted this way means they are justified in their actions, regardless of how much they contradict their own logic as long as they can "own the libs".
But no hypocrisy exists on the left who was cheering on the investigation and now simply wants to brush this aside?
I'm all for fairness. There is definitely enough evidence for an investigation. Lets investigate, for, lets say, at least 22 months. Lets lay some perjury traps and jail people for things that happen during the investigation that has absolutely nothing to do with the original investigation and if after, say, 22 months a report is issued in which the investigation doesn't recommend any indictments, we can all ignore it and still pretend everyone and everything associated with the investigation is guilty because we feel like it.
They simply don't see the hypocrisy. They believe that since the "libs" already acted this way means they are justified in their actions, regardless of how much they contradict their own logic as long as they can "own the libs".
But no hypocrisy exists on the left who was cheering on the investigation and now simply wants to brush this aside?
I'm all for fairness. There is definitely enough evidence for an investigation. Lets investigate, for, lets say, at least 22 months. Lets lay some perjury traps and jail people for things that happen during the investigation that has absolutely nothing to do with the original investigation and if after, say, 22 months a report is issued in which the investigation doesn't recommend any indictments, we can all ignore it and still pretend everyone and everything associated with the investigation is guilty because we feel like it.
Just smile.
They are so ruined by falling for the Russia scam that they laughably try to cling to their shovel with "agree with me or you're a hypocrite". Yes, it's silly nonsense, but really, they don't have any good options.
I'm nobody's personal errand boy willing to go out and gather links. I don't waste my time playing that game with people like you, nor do I feel like arguing.
So, in other words, you just want to spew your opinions all over the place - then pretend like they're facts and get indignant with anyone that dares question their veracity.
I spoke on facts that are well documented. Not from my opinion. Also, not trying to come off sounding "indignant".
I honestly don't care in the least if/when people question the veracity of what I posted as factual in this thread. It'll actually make it that much sweeter when the smell of napalm is in the air soon...
Last Edit: Apr 30, 2019 14:58:41 GMT -8 by Deleted