I spoke on facts that are well documented. Not from my opinion. Also, not trying to come off sounding "indignant".
I honestly don't care in the least if/when people question the veracity of what I posted as factual in this thread. It'll actually make it that much sweeter when the smell of napalm is in the air soon...
If they're "well documented", then you shouldn't have any issues finding and posting them. Since you didn't, either you're full of shit or just lazy. Your pick.
You are correct. I won't have a hard time finding them, and yes I am lazy in that regard here, for good reason.
Great Example: Tinley already went out of his way to post links on basically everything I spoke of, and still got nothing more than a one line zinger and people just lol'ing at his links. Nothing of substance at all in response. This is exactly why I don't go out of my way to post links.
My feeling is this: NO evidence will EVER be ENOUGH evidence for many of you. Like Tinley said, ya'll are too far dug in to back out now. lol
Last Edit: Apr 30, 2019 15:16:52 GMT -8 by Deleted
You are correct. I won't have a hard time finding them, and yes I am lazy in that regard here, for good reason.
Great Example: Tinley already went out of his way to post links on basically everything I spoke of, and still got nothing more than a one line zinger and people just lol'ing at his links. Nothing of substance at all in response. This is exactly why I don't go out of my way to post links.
My feeling is this: NO evidence will EVER be ENOUGH evidence for many of you. Like Tinley said, ya'll are too far dug in to back out now. lol
Thanks for admitting you're just too lazy to back up your drivel. At least we have it from the horse's mouth now.
And thank you for selectively answering only one part of my response while ignoring the rest.
If they're "well documented", then you shouldn't have any issues finding and posting them. Since you didn't, either you're full of shit or just lazy. Your pick.
You are correct. I won't have a hard time finding them, and yes I am lazy in that regard here, for good reason.
Great Example: Tinley already went out of his way to post links on basically everything I spoke of, and still got nothing more than a one line zinger and people just lol'ing at his links. Nothing of substance at all in response. This is exactly why I don't go out of my way to post links.
My feeling is this: NO evidence will EVER be ENOUGH evidence for many of you. Like Tinley said, ya'll are too far dug in to back out now. lol
So when people go through the effort of posting links do you give them their due and a legitimate response after looking over the information?
Last Edit: Apr 30, 2019 16:08:02 GMT -8 by Deleted
As opposed to the Russian collusion investigation, there is actual known wrong doing to determine Who, What and Why.
I have not determined wrongdoing or called for jail. In fact, I've opposed jail for anything Hillery might be implicated for. I've specifically posted we need to know if there was incompetence, corruption or criminality and respond accordingly.
Both instances are consistent.
The hypocrisy you seek is those who demanded an endless Meuller look into any and all in a quest to find anything to take down Trump, and now want to close shop uninterested at all in gov't incompetence or abuse.
As usual, you got everything wrong. That being said, I'm not at all interested in arguing with you about it - given that you've shown you'll just continue to double-down (and triple-down) on stupid just to avoid admitting error.
He hasn't said anything wrong or incorrect in this thread. In fact, he's been spot on.
Ironic seeing you call him stupid, and saying that you're no longer interested in talking about it with him anymore.
All he's done is taken the time to provide links, backing up what we've both been trying to tell you all this time. All you've done is ignore responding back with any serious intent, probably cause you ain't got shit left in the shit tank.
Nevertheless, you got what you asked for, and acted like it wasn't posted and had nothing to say in response.
You called me lazy for not digging up links for you myself. It's not called laziness. It's called experience.
Tinley and I have been saying the same things in this thread. He did what you were trying so hard to get me to do, which was to waste time posting links to people like you, who are only out to frustrate and tire people out by wasting their time.
Last Edit: Apr 30, 2019 16:18:48 GMT -8 by Deleted
He hasn't said anything wrong or incorrect in this thread. In fact, he's been spot on.
Ironic seeing you call him stupid, and saying that you're no longer interested in talking about it with him anymore.
All he's done is taken the time to provide links, backing up what we've both been trying to tell you all this time. All you've done is ignore responding back with any serious intent, probably cause you ain't got shit left in the shit tank.
Nevertheless, you got what you asked for, and acted like it wasn't posted and had nothing to say in response.
You called me lazy for not digging up links for you myself. It's not called laziness. It's called experience.
Tinley and I have been saying the same things in this thread. He did what you were trying so hard to get me to do, which was to waste time posting links to people like you, who are only out to frustrate and tire people out by wasting their time.
Every link he posted in this thread was addressed. Not by me, because by the time I read them they were already adequately addressed by others. The rest of his posts were standard Keggerbot responses or doubling down on stupid figures that were already proven wrong in other threads.
Why don't you stop relying on others to do the work for you?
Talking to you is like:
Everything said to you is in one ear and right out the other...
Last Edit: Apr 30, 2019 16:46:42 GMT -8 by Deleted
So when people go through the effort of posting links do you give them their due and a legitimate response after looking over the information?
If I personally asked them to post links to back up their point, then the answer would be absolutely yes. I'm not the one asking people to post links though, so keep that in mind.
You are correct. I won't have a hard time finding them, and yes I am lazy in that regard here, for good reason.
Great Example: Tinley already went out of his way to post links on basically everything I spoke of, and still got nothing more than a one line zinger and people just lol'ing at his links. Nothing of substance at all in response. This is exactly why I don't go out of my way to post links.
My feeling is this: NO evidence will EVER be ENOUGH evidence for many of you. Like Tinley said, ya'll are too far dug in to back out now. lol
So when people go through the effort of posting links do you give them their due and a legitimate response after looking over the information?
No, the bitch baby complains about fake news but doesn’t read links.
He hasn't said anything wrong or incorrect in this thread. In fact, he's been spot on.
Ironic seeing you call him stupid, and saying that you're no longer interested in talking about it with him anymore.
All he's done is taken the time to provide links, backing up what we've both been trying to tell you all this time. All you've done is ignore responding back with any serious intent, probably cause you ain't got shit left in the shit tank.
Nevertheless, you got what you asked for, and acted like it wasn't posted and had nothing to say in response.
You called me lazy for not digging up links for you myself. It's not called laziness. It's called experience.
Tinley and I have been saying the same things in this thread. He did what you were trying so hard to get me to do, which was to waste time posting links to people like you, who are only out to frustrate and tire people out by wasting their time.
Every link he posted in this thread was addressed. Not by me, because by the time I read them they were already adequately addressed by others. The rest of his posts were standard Keggerbot responses or doubling down on stupid figures that were already proven wrong in other threads.
Why don't you stop relying on others to do the work for you?
Because if Eddie wasn’t in a constant state of bitch baby, he wouldn’t exist.
He won't because he can't. He simply declares himself a winner and posts silly words in a quest to have the last word. Apparently a paper crown plays well on FaceBook.
He won't because he can't. He simply declares himself a winner and posts silly words in a quest to have the last word. Apparently a paper crown plays well on FaceBook.
Still waiting for either of you to prove me wrong - which, in fairness, (1) I asked for first, and (2) that's simply how burden of proof works. Your move.
I'm not posting for anyone else.
For me, even here you're wrong. I did in fact show where you were wrong. Your response to that was...
As usual, you got everything wrong. That being said, I'm not at all interested in arguing with you about it - given that you've shown you'll just continue to double-down (and triple-down) on stupid just to avoid admitting error. prosportsrecreation.com/post/855467/thread
For me, even here you're wrong. I did in fact show where you were wrong. Your response to that was...
As usual, you got everything wrong. That being said, I'm not at all interested in arguing with you about it - given that you've shown you'll just continue to double-down (and triple-down) on stupid just to avoid admitting error. prosportsrecreation.com/post/855467/thread
A text book example of my post you just quoted.
No, that was a separate conversation entirely - please try to keep up, it's exhausting having to repeatedly explain everything to you like you are a 5 year old. If you want to prove my statement to eddie wrong, feel free.
That being said, I also stand by my italicized comment above. You, in particular, have proven that - amidst being proven wrong by a literal horde of people - you will go down with your ship no matter what. While that's sort of admirable, in a sadistic kind of way, I don't have the patience for entertaining that kind of nonsense. If you were to start setting a precedent that you are willing to admit fault with your statements, I'll change this opinion.
The daily double...
First you prove the accuracy of my post-
He won't because he can't. He simply declares himself a winner and posts silly words in a quest to have the last word. Apparently a paper crown plays well on FaceBook.
Then you haul ass from my example..
If that's all you've got, I guess you're stuck with it.