A crisis of the opposite sort is brewing: a broader decline in immigration The resulting shortfall in population is already making it harder to find workers and threatens to do more damage to the economy Net international migration added 247,000 to America's population between July 2020 and July 2021. The smallest increase in 30 years The number of Mexicans living in America peaked 15 years ago. The estimated population of immigrants in the United States has declined from 12.2m in 2007 to 10m in 2020 The shortfall is visible in the labor market. Roughly 1.8m working-age foreign migrants are missing Employers in restaurant and accommodations sector, which draws 25% of its employees from foreign-born population could not fill 15% of jobs last year Employers in business services which draws 20% of its employees from foreign-born population could not fill 10% of jobs last year That in turn contributes to higher wages, with pay rising especially quickly for low-income earners New immigration accounted for 70% of growth in the American labor force in the 2010's Over the next two decades, immigrants are likely to be the only source of labor growth Quotas for seasonal, standard, and highly skilled work visas have not been updated since the 1990's Democrats worry about looking soft on border security while Republicans are bussing immigrants to NYC and DC The conclusion is a dismal one: the headaches of the past year from worker shortages will be a recurrent problem in a ageing America.
Leftist advocacy groups specialize in this to push agendas. Let's see how some of these contradict reality-
The number of Mexicans living in America peaked 15 years ago.
Number of Mexican People in the United States
In this article, we will explore the demographic data of Mexican people in the United States, and look at historical data to see whether the Mexican population is growing or declining.
First, let's take a look at the population of Mexican people in the United States for the last 6 years.
The table above shows that between 2015 and 2020 the total Mexican population has increased by 1,896,741 people.
If this growth were to continue at the same rate, the total population of Mexican people by 2025 could be 38,433,769.
A crisis of the opposite sort is brewing: a broader decline in immigration The resulting shortfall in population is already making it harder to find workers and threatens to do more damage to the economy
Declining populations hurt many major countries including China, Japan, many in Europe as well as the US. It creates many problems including supporting social programs that depend on major growth of those paying in for those drawing from. It also creates special problems like infrastructure (medical care, transportation, water, housing, schools, energy, waste, policing) it isn't the free ride open borders pretend it is.
Employers in business services which draws 20% of its employees from foreign-born population could not fill 10% of jobs last year That in turn contributes to higher wages, with pay rising especially quickly for low-income earners
Wholly dishonest. (likely even more extreme) Immigrants typically lower worker pay.
Aztec Framing owner pleads guilty to recruiting illegal foreign workers
ROME, Georgia (WDEF) – A Georgia businessman who had operations in our area has pleaded guilty to harboring illegal aliens.
Juan Antonio Perez lives in Bartow County.
But he owns Aztec Framing that had offices in Rossville and Hixson.
Those offices were raided in 2019 as part of the investigation.
Investigators say he recruited, hid and hired illegal workers from other countries.
Prosecutors say Perez entered the U.S. illegally, himself, in 1992.
He operated Aztec Framing since 2009 and it made him wealthy.
“The old saying that crime doesn’t pay couldn’t be truer than in this instance. Perez thought his scheme to exploit desperate people looking for work and a better life would go unnoticed, but he was wrong and will now be held accountable,” said Special Agent in Charge Katrina W. Berger, who oversees Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) operations in Georgia and Alabama.
They say he paid his illegal workers below-market rates, offered no benefits or insurance and failed to pay either payroll or Social Security taxes on them.
He earned enough to build a 7,500-square-foot house along with other houses for some of his employees.
Perez owned more than 30 sports cars and customized trucks and collected firearms.
But the state of Georgia has no record of him reporting any income.
Perez pleaded guilty on Wednesday to “knowingly encouraging and inducing aliens to come to, enter, and reside in the United States for the purpose of commercial advantage and private financial gain, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, and residence in the United States was in violation of law.”
Breaking this down, he used cheap immigrant labor to price cut the competition. He did this by paying them low wages. How did competitors survive? (ding, ding, ding) Hopefully you said "they hired illegal migrants for low wages too"! That doesn't raise the pay of workers, it lowers it. After the arrest, companies and consumers immediately raised concern over.......Nailed it- Hiring American workers that would be paid more. That means what to consumers? Higher costs. Yep, workers making more equals consumers paying more. (they have a word for that- consequences) And we haven't even considered the displaced American workers. What do you have for them? How many displaced roofers will be hired at your tech company?
Once you push aside the agenda propaganda, consider the facts on the ground. If endless migrants are so valuable for the country, identify the locations fighting to draw as many as possible. Who is making the plea for Please come here! I have an experience they are far fewer than those who say Go somewhere else!
Yet how many times have you encountered a business that was closed for the day or closing for additional days per week because they can’t find help?
Businesses that grew and thrived before gov't locked down the economy and closed business and forced terminations. Immigration didn't cause their problems and isn't their savior.
Exactly, anyone worth their salt in economics knows that immigration is necessary.
No one is arguing against immigration. This is the specific and prolific mass failure of the left, everything is only the extreme choice. Zero immigration or endless, relentless un limited immigration.
To simplify this (hopefully someday you will be able to understand the simple basics on your own) I'll put it in an example you have a chance to understand-
Every franchise worth its salt knows attendance is necessary. Can you figure out why franchises, let's use the Steelers for this exercise, don't just open the doors and say all ye, all ye in come free!?
Just think of the money the team could save on ticket management, gates and turnstile maintenance and put over a hundred(s?) thousand in for every game.
And yep, even the Steelers know attendance is necessary.
Exactly, anyone worth their salt in economics knows that immigration is necessary.
No one is arguing against immigration. This is the specific and prolific mass failure of the left, everything is only the extreme choice. Zero immigration or endless, relentless un limited immigration.
To simplify this (hopefully someday you will be able to understand the simple basics on your own) I'll put it in an example you have a chance to understand-
Every franchise worth its salt knows attendance is necessary. Can you figure out why franchises, let's use the Steelers for this exercise, don't just open the doors and say all ye, all ye in come free!?
Just think of the money the team could save on ticket management, gates and turnstile maintenance and put over a hundred(s?) thousand in for every game.
And yep, even the Steelers know attendance is necessary.
I'd believe that if your party didn't constantly make it harder to immigrate. Whether it be either skilled or labor immigrants.
We're definitely capable of doing so. The US already produces enough food to support 400 million people, you could put every one of the new arrivals east of the Mississippi and the population density would simply be equal to Europe.
The only thing necessary to achieve that would be getting deregulate housing and zoning rules.
Though I realize that you're not concerned with whether we "can" do it. So Tinley what sort of immigrants are acceptable to you?
No one is arguing against immigration. This is the specific and prolific mass failure of the left, everything is only the extreme choice. Zero immigration or endless, relentless un limited immigration.
To simplify this (hopefully someday you will be able to understand the simple basics on your own) I'll put it in an example you have a chance to understand-
Every franchise worth its salt knows attendance is necessary. Can you figure out why franchises, let's use the Steelers for this exercise, don't just open the doors and say all ye, all ye in come free!?
Just think of the money the team could save on ticket management, gates and turnstile maintenance and put over a hundred(s?) thousand in for every game.
And yep, even the Steelers know attendance is necessary.
I'd believe that if your party didn't constantly make it harder to immigrate. Whether it be either skilled or labor immigrants.
We're definitely capable of doing so. The US already produces enough food to support 400 million people, you could put every one of the new arrivals east of the Mississippi and the population density would simply be equal to Europe.
The only thing necessary to achieve that would be getting deregulate housing and zoning rules.
Though I realize that you're not concerned with whether we "can" do it. So Tinley what sort of immigrants are acceptable to you?
I'd believe that if your party didn't constantly make it harder to immigrate. Whether it be either skilled or labor immigrants.
We're definitely capable of doing so. The US already produces enough food to support 400 million people, you could put every one of the new arrivals east of the Mississippi and the population density would simply be equal to Europe.
That's not (near) enough concession to save you. Substituting running and hiding for rational, coherent thought isn't helping you either.
The only thing necessary to achieve that would be getting deregulate housing and zoning rules.
You obviously but clearly haven't put much thought into this. "Only thing"? We have water shortage concerns out west. Energy shortages rolling across the country. Every spending bill gets weeks of crying buh, buh, buh, the infrastructure.....and all of that is pushed aside by health care "crisis", schools deteriorating, the rapidly growing homeless increasing can't afford the rising housing costs, the college educated don't want to pay their debts....
Buy you stick with "only thing" keeping endless millions from being added to our country.
Though I realize that you're not concerned with whether we "can" do it. So Tinley what sort of immigrants are acceptable to you?
I realize you aren't informed and can't be troubled to think this out, but the immigrants I find acceptable are those (and I have many in my circle of friends) who come here legally and can contribute more than they consume.
Your turn- which immigrants are acceptable to you?
I'd believe that if your party didn't constantly make it harder to immigrate. Whether it be either skilled or labor immigrants.
We're definitely capable of doing so. The US already produces enough food to support 400 million people, you could put every one of the new arrivals east of the Mississippi and the population density would simply be equal to Europe.
That's not (near) enough concession to save you. Substituting running and hiding for rational, coherent thought isn't helping you either.
The only thing necessary to achieve that would be getting deregulate housing and zoning rules.
You obviously but clearly haven't put much thought into this. "Only thing"? We have water shortage concerns out west. Energy shortages rolling across the country. Every spending bill gets weeks of crying buh, buh, buh, the infrastructure.....and all of that is pushed aside by health care "crisis", schools deteriorating, the rapidly growing homeless increasing can't afford the rising housing costs, the college educated don't want to pay their debts....
Buy you stick with "only thing" keeping endless millions from being added to our country.
Though I realize that you're not concerned with whether we "can" do it. So Tinley what sort of immigrants are acceptable to you?
I realize you aren't informed and can't be troubled to think this out, but the immigrants I find acceptable are those (and I have many in my circle of friends) who come here legally and can contribute more than they consume.
Your turn- which immigrants are acceptable to you?
So the reason we can't have that is because of problems created by corporatism and conservatives. Glad we could narrow that down.
Yo answer your question, any who are willing to contribute and not be a problem.
I'd believe that if your party didn't constantly make it harder to immigrate. Whether it be either skilled or labor immigrants.
We're definitely capable of doing so. The US already produces enough food to support 400 million people, you could put every one of the new arrivals east of the Mississippi and the population density would simply be equal to Europe.
The only thing necessary to achieve that would be getting deregulate housing and zoning rules.
Though I realize that you're not concerned with whether we "can" do it. So Tinley what sort of immigrants are acceptable to you?
What do you mean by that?
Greatly reduce parking minimum requirements in lieu of better public transportation and better city planning. Remove height restrictions on buildings (but not too high, sky scrapers for housing have diminishing returns), and adjusting restrictive lot minimums mostly.
Greatly reduce parking minimum requirements in lieu of better public transportation and better city planning. Remove height restrictions on buildings (but not too high, sky scrapers for housing have diminishing returns), and adjusting restrictive lot minimums mostly.
Parking minimums exist so that everyone living in high density building have a place to park, and they also include minimums for handicapped parking spaces. Can't tell people you can live here but can't have a car or have to park miles away. Can't tell handicapped people there isn't anywhere for them to park, that's a violation of the ADA.
Height restrictions are for more than just cosmetic purposes. Areas near airports for example. Those areas are height restricted due to requirements set out by the FAA. Just happens that areas near airports are also less desirable, due to the noise.
Lot setbacks, especially at intersections, are necessary for vision. Have to be able to see down the cross street for safety, or else you are building an unnecessary safety risk into the neighborhood.
Those are only a few of the reasons behind some of the restrictions set out in zoning codes
Greatly reduce parking minimum requirements in lieu of better public transportation and better city planning. Remove height restrictions on buildings (but not too high, sky scrapers for housing have diminishing returns), and adjusting restrictive lot minimums mostly.
Parking minimums exist so that everyone living in high density building have a place to park, and they also include minimums for handicapped parking spaces. Can't tell people you can live here but can't have a car or have to park miles away. Can't tell handicapped people there isn't anywhere for them to park, that's a violation of the ADA.
Height restrictions are for more than just cosmetic purposes. Areas near airports for example. Those areas are height restricted due to requirements set out by the FAA. Just happens that areas near airports are also less desirable, due to the noise.
Lot setbacks, especially at intersections, are necessary for vision. Have to be able to see down the cross street for safety, or else you are building an unnecessary safety risk into the neighborhood.
Those are only a few of the reasons behind some of the restrictions set out in zoning codes
I assume you don't believe that I'd want to eliminate all parking, especially handicap parking. Nor do you think that I want to have tall buildings in front of airport taxi lanes. Not sure why that would need mentioning.
Especially the parking minimums are out of control. When there is a massive parking requirement for every business it only makes problems worse. Obviously it takes up more space which otherwise could be built up. As well as put more distance between destinations, which creates more vehicle traffic necessity, which creates more demand for parking... I'm sure you see the problem here.
Parking minimums exist so that everyone living in high density building have a place to park, and they also include minimums for handicapped parking spaces. Can't tell people you can live here but can't have a car or have to park miles away. Can't tell handicapped people there isn't anywhere for them to park, that's a violation of the ADA.
Height restrictions are for more than just cosmetic purposes. Areas near airports for example. Those areas are height restricted due to requirements set out by the FAA. Just happens that areas near airports are also less desirable, due to the noise.
Lot setbacks, especially at intersections, are necessary for vision. Have to be able to see down the cross street for safety, or else you are building an unnecessary safety risk into the neighborhood.
Those are only a few of the reasons behind some of the restrictions set out in zoning codes
I assume you don't believe that I'd want to eliminate all parking, especially handicap parking. Nor do you think that I want to have tall buildings in front of airport taxi lanes. Not sure why that would need mentioning.
Especially the parking minimums are out of control. When there is a massive parking requirement for every business it only makes problems worse. Obviously it takes up more space which otherwise could be built up. As well as put more distance between destinations, which creates more vehicle traffic necessity, which creates more demand for parking... I'm sure you see the problem here.
This atrocity is what we're trying to avoid.
Parking minimums for apartments are generally based on the number of bedrooms. One spot per. Parking requirements for businesses are generally based on square footage of the business. Those vary depending on the type of business. For example, a restaurant may have a requirement of 1 spot per 50 Sq. Ft of floor space. A department store may be 1 per 100 Sq ft. A law office may be 1 per 125 Sq ft. Handicap spots are a minimum of 2 per business with additional spots based on the size of the business. And can't just put those hc spots anywhere. They have very specific requirements for the slope and cross slope of the spot, as well as the access path to the door.
Not entirely sure why you would want to make access to housing and businesses harder by eliminating those minimums.
I assume you don't believe that I'd want to eliminate all parking, especially handicap parking. Nor do you think that I want to have tall buildings in front of airport taxi lanes. Not sure why that would need mentioning.
Especially the parking minimums are out of control. When there is a massive parking requirement for every business it only makes problems worse. Obviously it takes up more space which otherwise could be built up. As well as put more distance between destinations, which creates more vehicle traffic necessity, which creates more demand for parking... I'm sure you see the problem here.
This atrocity is what we're trying to avoid.
Parking minimums for apartments are generally based on the number of bedrooms. One spot per. Parking requirements for businesses are generally based on square footage of the business. Those vary depending on the type of business. For example, a restaurant may have a requirement of 1 spot per 50 Sq. Ft of floor space. A department store may be 1 per 100 Sq ft. A law office may be 1 per 125 Sq ft. Handicap spots are a minimum of 2 per business with additional spots based on the size of the business. And can't just put those hc spots anywhere. They have very specific requirements for the slope and cross slope of the spot, as well as the access path to the door.
Not entirely sure why you would want to make access to housing and businesses harder by eliminating those minimums.
Because public transit, walking, and just being smarter with locations in relation to residents and work is superior to massive parking lots in which a good portion of each large parking lot can be done away with or made into a parking garage. Which like I said only makes the problem worse.
Greatly reduce parking minimum requirements in lieu of better public transportation and better city planning. Remove height restrictions on buildings (but not too high, sky scrapers for housing have diminishing returns), and adjusting restrictive lot minimums mostly.
The absolute complete ridiculousness of this suggestion is staggering. Its almost like you have absolutely no idea whatsoever about development.
Yet how many times have you encountered a business that was closed for the day or closing for additional days per week because they can’t find help?
I see it every day. I must be blind
Weird. Wonder why not working is better for some than actually working? But we need illegal immigration.
We get illegal immigration because the blowhards on both sides of the aisle aren’t serious about solving thorny problems. Some would rather bus illegals around the country