Student Loan Forgiveness

So your argument is that a wack anti-abortion lady somehow retrieved fetuses with no proof that a clinic was doing anything illegal…

Half of the article is literally a confession on Twitter from
someone talking about all of their dumpster diving for fetuses outside abortion clinics...

"Then, in 2020, Handy asked, “How can I break off a bond with someone who helped me dumpster dive to retrieve aborted babies for burial? Or go inside abortion centers together?” That same year, she also tweeted about how she regretted that she “got caught dumpster diving” and ran away without any fetuses.

“Those humans deserved a burial,” she tweeted.

“How can I miss someone I’ve never seen? Well, scratch that, miss someone I’ve only encountered by holding their little broken body,” Handy tweeted in March 2021, adding that she found “the little boy” while “dumpster diving at an abortion center.” “He was given a proper Catholic burial with a priest,” Handy added. Handy appeared to name the fetus Joseph Patrick.

In May 2021, Handy tweeted about a time in 2016 when, she said, she arrived too late “to retrieve aborted babies for burial.”

In a separate instance that same month, Handy tweeted that she was “going to pick out a picture frame for this ultrasound of a child killed by abortion.” She said two associates “went dumpster diving” at an abortion clinic and came back with the ultrasound image."

Nowhere in there is a confession to retrieving fetuses from a dumpster.


There’s also this quote from a person who runs a different abortion clinic in Alabama:


“Today, clinics place anything that could contain any sort of pathogen or blood in biohazard containers that are picked up by service providers. Some—like ours—are also required to send all POC (products of conception) to a pathology lab,” Marty tweeted. “Dumpsters are for trash. Period.”


There is no evidence in that article to suggest this clinic was doing otherwise.

Jesus paying for everyone's sins by dying on the cross is an insult to everyone who paid for their own sins.

That's the key but critical point, and no one wants to fix it....

Make up your mind. I don't understand why that is so difficult for you.

People paid (borrowed) fairly large amounts of money to buy an education. They signed a contract to do this. If that schooling equals education and improves intelligence, then they have the tools to satisfy their part of the contract.

People have debt for many things, many of them do not enable a returning income- medical, auto, home, credit cards....

Those would be a more meaningful target and should receive higher priority.

What was the odds that someone who who hates the fuck out of the Constitution would condemn the constitutional process when the authoritarian autocratic anti-democratic path is so satisfying?