Shortly after the majority draft opinion was leaked from the Supreme Court in May, the Republican lawmaker expressed his support for the reversal of Roe v. Wade, declaring that “it means that every state will decide if abortion is legal and on what terms.”
He added at the time: “That, in my view, is the most constitutionally sound way of dealing with this issue and the way the United States handled the issue until 1973.”
He's 100% right. Roe wasn't a federal law. States handling the issue is the most constitutionally sound way of dealing with the issue, and that's how we dealt with it until Roe was wrongly decided. Now that's fixed, despite all the tears. Has nothing to do with a federal law that would codify abortion rules that didn't exist.
I know I know, teets, flap jacks, pretzels and hot dogs or something interesting like that. Its really not complicated though, I'm sure you can figure this out. Rooting for you. Brah.
Shortly after the majority draft opinion was leaked from the Supreme Court in May, the Republican lawmaker expressed his support for the reversal of Roe v. Wade, declaring that “it means that every state will decide if abortion is legal and on what terms.”
He added at the time: “That, in my view, is the most constitutionally sound way of dealing with this issue and the way the United States handled the issue until 1973.”
He's 100% right. Roe wasn't a federal law. States handling the issue is the most constitutionally sound way of dealing with the issue, and that's how we dealt with it until Roe was wrongly decided. Now that's fixed, despite all the tears. Has nothing to do with a federal law that would codify abortion rules that didn't exist.
I know I know, teets, flap jacks, pretzels and hot dogs or something interesting like that. Its really not complicated though, I'm sure you can figure this out. Rooting for you. Brah.