It's pretty shocking that he hasn't been forced out yet. That would be sufficient enough. All of his lies being exposed will be enough to tarnish anything he tries to touch for a long time.
It's pretty shocking that he hasn't been forced out yet. That would be sufficient enough. All of his lies being exposed will be enough to tarnish anything he tries to touch for a long time.
It's pretty shocking that he hasn't been forced out yet. That would be sufficient enough. All of his lies being exposed will be enough to tarnish anything he tries to touch for a long time.
It's pretty shocking that he hasn't been forced out yet. That would be sufficient enough. All of his lies being exposed will be enough to tarnish anything he tries to touch for a long time.
Why is it shocking that he hasn't been forced out? For the same reason any reputable employer would terminate an employee when they mislead/misrepresent their background and achievements in order to obtain a position.
Why is it shocking that he hasn't been forced out? For the same reason any reputable employer would terminate an employee when they mislead/misrepresent their background and achievements in order to obtain a position.
something something democrats
presented by the party of personal responsibility - republicans
Last Edit: Jan 19, 2023 7:03:56 GMT -8 by nubulator
Lopping off George Santos penis with electric hedge trimmers would be too good for him
It's pretty shocking that he hasn't been forced out yet. That would be sufficient enough. All of his lies being exposed will be enough to tarnish anything he tries to touch for a long time.
No one in the House can partner with him. He's toxic and will ruin the image of others as well.
Why is it shocking that he hasn't been forced out? For the same reason any reputable employer would terminate an employee when they mislead/misrepresent their background and achievements in order to obtain a position.
Fair enough....But is does raise some interesting but confusing issues.
1. A local republican group voiced concerns about him before the election and advised voters to vote for the dem. 2. NY voters have a (powerfully strong) history of electing shit and dishonest characters to public office, do you support throwing them all out? 3. The president has a long, strong and prolific history of lying about his past, have you or anyone you can cite called for his removal? 4. Lying before an election is obviously bad but is it as bad as lying in office? Adam Schiff las lied about nearly everything in office and has caused major harm to the country. Is that removable? Have you or anyone you know of called for that? 5. His term before reelection is two (2) years. Is that too long to wait? Biden has two (2) years, is that too long to wait? 6. Are you now claiming gov't is "reputable"?
Why is it shocking that he hasn't been forced out? For the same reason any reputable employer would terminate an employee when they mislead/misrepresent their background and achievements in order to obtain a position.
something something democrats
presented by the party of personal responsibility - republicans
She has Palestinian parents. She's not lying about who she is. She's expressing her opinion.
Now you're moving the goal posts just to keep gripping your shovel. Your point was <copy/paste> toxic. I addressed lying in another response. Feel free to tackle that.
There is a (D)ifference. Most TDS don't see the difference.
Why is it shocking that he hasn't been forced out? For the same reason any reputable employer would terminate an employee when they mislead/misrepresent their background and achievements in order to obtain a position.
Fair enough....But is does raise some interesting but confusing issues.
1. A local republican group voiced concerns about him before the election and advised voters to vote for the dem.
2. NY voters have a (powerfully strong) history of electing shit and dishonest characters to public office, do you support throwing them all out? Yes
3. The president has a long, strong and prolific history of lying about his past, have you or anyone you can cite called for his removal? Apples to oranges comparison. One lied about credentials to get the job in the first place. Show me where grandpa Joe used his lies to create a fake persona in order to get elected to the senate. If that's what happened he should've been removed. As far as I know his false claims were made during his attempt to run for president in 1988 and were said to justify why he's smarter than someone lol. And he didn't get elected.
4. Lying before an election is obviously bad but is it as bad as lying in office? I suppose that would depend on what said lie is about.Can't lie if they're never there in the first place because they're a fraud.
Adam Schiff las lied about nearly everything in office and has caused major harm to the country. Is that removable? I would need to know what you are referring to to answer that.
6. Are you now claiming gov't is "reputable"? It should be
She has Palestinian parents. She's not lying about who she is. She's expressing her opinion.
Now you're moving the goal posts just to keep gripping your shovel. Your point was <copy/paste> toxic. I addressed lying in another response. Feel free to tackle that.
There is a (D)ifference. Most TDS don't see the difference.
Now you're moving the goal posts just to keep gripping your shovel. Your point was <copy/paste> toxic. I addressed lying in another response. Feel free to tackle that.
There is a (D)ifference. Most TDS don't see the difference.
Ha Ha Now, you are playing your silly defense.
Exactly.
Your hiding spot was exposed so you start complaining.
Post by BuckysRevenge on Jan 19, 2023 8:49:46 GMT -8
People have forgotten that Tinley is an admitted party first voter. He has said he will vote for the R no matter what because if numbers in the House and Senate. He doesn't care who the R is, what the R has said or what the R has done. He will still vote for the R.
That is his mindset and the basis behind all his arguments.
People have forgotten that Tinley is an admitted party first voter. He has said he will vote for the R no matter what because if numbers in the House and Senate. He doesn't care who the R is, what the R has said or what the R has done. He will still vote for the R.
That is his mindset and the basis behind all his arguments.
Show me where grandpa Joe used his lies to create a fake persona in order to get elected to the senate. If that's what happened he should've been removed.
Lol, he literally tried to adopt someone else's life story as his own and had to drop out of the presidential election because of the controversy, but remained a senator.