WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Americans’ dissatisfaction with U.S. gun laws has risen to 63%, the highest by one percentage point in Gallup’s 23-year trend, and an increase of seven points over the past year. At the same time, satisfaction with gun policy has fallen by the same amount to 34%, tying the lowest reading on record.
63% of Americans are dissatisfied with U.S. gun laws; 34% satisfied
54% of Republicans are satisfied -- a one-year, five-point decrease
14% of Democrats are satisfied, down nine points to group’s record low
Bottom Line
Americans today are as dissatisfied with the nation’s gun laws as they have been in the past 23 years. That dissatisfaction is driven largely by Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents, who likely agree with the president and many Democrats in Congress that the gun legislation passed last year didn’t go far enough.
A majority of Americans continue to support stricter laws covering the sale of firearms, which has been the case for most years since the Sandy Hook School shooting, in contrast to opinions in the four years preceding it. Biden spoke about the need to pass further restrictions on gun ownership, including an assault weapons ban, in his State of the Union address earlier this month. Yet, the possibility of passing such a law in the near future seems remote. For now, any changes to gun laws are more likely to come from individual states, as they did in 2022.
History will look disfavorably upon today's adults that support our current gun laws and policies.
The youth are buying into the Democrat party.
We will be looked down upon as fools who supported frontier-era gun policies in a country that is run over by gun violence
Yep, and those yout's are not smart enough to turn the TV off to look at history and educate themselves...
Reality is that Trump did more for gun control that Obama before him and Biden since. But MSNBC won't tell you that, they'll tell you how much the NRA gave to the evil GOP...I wonder what they'd think if they knew Trump wanted to send the National Guard to Chicago to curb gun violence but Lightfoot kept them out of the city...
History will look disfavorably upon today's adults that support our current gun laws and policies.
The youth are buying into the Democrat party.
We will be looked down upon as fools who supported frontier-era gun policies in a country that is run over by gun violence
Yep, and those yout's are not smart enough to turn the TV off to look at history and educate themselves...
Reality is that Trump did more for gun control that Obama before him and Biden since. But MSNBC won't tell you that, they'll tell you how much the NRA gave to the evil GOP...I wonder what they'd think if they knew Trump wanted to send the National Guard to Chicago to curb gun violence but Lightfoot kept them out of the city...
by doing what? It's never a good idea to put people not from an area into an area and expect some sort of peace to occur. You have to have people from those areas establishing relationships. If not, it looks like an occupation and resentment brews. This occurs all over the world.
I think the national guard has its uses but unless there was an active civil war/gun battle going on, the national guard could only make things worse (or better for a very short period of time).
snerb Where are we going, and why am I in a hand basket?
Yep, and those yout's are not smart enough to turn the TV off to look at history and educate themselves...
Reality is that Trump did more for gun control that Obama before him and Biden since. But MSNBC won't tell you that, they'll tell you how much the NRA gave to the evil GOP...I wonder what they'd think if they knew Trump wanted to send the National Guard to Chicago to curb gun violence but Lightfoot kept them out of the city...
by doing what? It's never a good idea to put people not from an area into an area and expect some sort of peace to occur. You have to have people from those areas establishing relationships. If not, it looks like an occupation and resentment brews. This occurs all over the world.
I think the national guard has its uses but unless there was an active civil war/gun battle going on, the national guard could only make things worse (or better for a very short period of time).
by doing what? It's never a good idea to put people not from an area into an area and expect some sort of peace to occur. You have to have people from those areas establishing relationships. If not, it looks like an occupation and resentment brews. This occurs all over the world.
I think the national guard has its uses but unless there was an active civil war/gun battle going on, the national guard could only make things worse (or better for a very short period of time).
Or, do nothing...
yep; that's the only two choices, good faith discussion, as always
snerb Where are we going, and why am I in a hand basket?
yep; that's the only two choices, good faith discussion, as always
I'm not being intentionally negative here... Status quo is obviously an acceptable solution for these city leaders. Chicago, St. Louis, Baltimore...they all have historic levels of violence, and it's getting worse, not better.
Why wouldn't city leaders reach out for federal help? (Semi rhetorical)
yep; that's the only two choices, good faith discussion, as always
I'm not being intentionally negative here... Status quo is obviously an acceptable solution for these city leaders. Chicago, St. Louis, Baltimore...they all have historic levels of violence, and it's getting worse, not better.
Why wouldn't city leaders reach out for federal help? (Semi rhetorical)
probably because it isn't something that federal help would solve. I am sure there are changes every year from "status quo"; we just don't know about them because we don't live there and don't read about any legislative changes, policing changes, community outreach initiatives.
snerb Where are we going, and why am I in a hand basket?
I'm not being intentionally negative here... Status quo is obviously an acceptable solution for these city leaders. Chicago, St. Louis, Baltimore...they all have historic levels of violence, and it's getting worse, not better.
Why wouldn't city leaders reach out for federal help? (Semi rhetorical)
probably because it isn't something that federal help would solve. I am sure there are changes every year from "status quo"; we just don't know about them because we don't live there and don't read about any legislative changes, policing changes, community outreach initiatives.
The other consideration is who those cities are voting into office. Would you vote to re-elect Lightfoot in Chicago? I certainly wouldn't....but many would, as crazy as that sounds.
History will look disfavorably upon today's adults that support our current gun laws and policies.
The youth are buying into the Democrat party.
We will be looked down upon as fools who supported frontier-era gun policies in a country that is run over by gun violence
Yep, and those yout's are not smart enough to turn the TV off to look at history and educate themselves...
Reality is that Trump did more for gun control that Obama before him and Biden since. But MSNBC won't tell you that, they'll tell you how much the NRA gave to the evil GOP...I wonder what they'd think if they knew Trump wanted to send the National Guard to Chicago to curb gun violence but Lightfoot kept them out of the city...
Not sure what your point is. Interesting to learn that you watch MSNBC.
snerb Where are we going, and why am I in a hand basket?
Yep, and those yout's are not smart enough to turn the TV off to look at history and educate themselves...
Reality is that Trump did more for gun control that Obama before him and Biden since. But MSNBC won't tell you that, they'll tell you how much the NRA gave to the evil GOP...I wonder what they'd think if they knew Trump wanted to send the National Guard to Chicago to curb gun violence but Lightfoot kept them out of the city...
Not sure what your point is. Interesting to learn that you watch MSNBC.
My point is that the Democratic party is doing nothing.
Why do you say that Democratic party is doing nothing? Is that convinient NRA/Trump talk? Whatever comes out of their mouths must be right?
June 25, 2022
President Biden on Saturday signed into law the first major gun safety legislation passed by Congress in nearly 30 years.
"While this bill doesn't do everything I want, it does include actions I've long called for that are going to save lives," Biden said just before signing the measure.
Includes incentives for states to pass so-called red flag laws that allow groups to petition courts to remove weapons from people deemed a threat to themselves or others.
In addition, the bill expands an existing law that prevents people convicted of domestic abuse from owning a gun to include dating partners rather than just spouses and former spouses.
It also expands background checks on people between the ages of 18 and 21 seeking to buy a gun.
The National Rifle Association says it opposes the bill.
Why do you say that Democratic party is doing nothing? Is that convinient NRA/Trump talk? Whatever comes out of their mouths must be right?
June 25, 2022
President Biden on Saturday signed into law the first major gun safety legislation passed by Congress in nearly 30 years.
"While this bill doesn't do everything I want, it does include actions I've long called for that are going to save lives," Biden said just before signing the measure.
Includes incentives for states to pass so-called red flag laws that allow groups to petition courts to remove weapons from people deemed a threat to themselves or others.
In addition, the bill expands an existing law that prevents people convicted of domestic abuse from owning a gun to include dating partners rather than just spouses and former spouses.
It also expands background checks on people between the ages of 18 and 21 seeking to buy a gun.
The National Rifle Association says it opposes the bill.
Who cares if the NRA opposed the bill, they don't directly vote on legislation. And of course they oppose it... What else would you expect from them? They're a special interest group.
This bill will have minimal impact in preventing shootings and protecting our nations kids.
Why do you say that Democratic party is doing nothing? Is that convinient NRA/Trump talk? Whatever comes out of their mouths must be right?
June 25, 2022
President Biden on Saturday signed into law the first major gun safety legislation passed by Congress in nearly 30 years.
"While this bill doesn't do everything I want, it does include actions I've long called for that are going to save lives," Biden said just before signing the measure.
Includes incentives for states to pass so-called red flag laws that allow groups to petition courts to remove weapons from people deemed a threat to themselves or others.
In addition, the bill expands an existing law that prevents people convicted of domestic abuse from owning a gun to include dating partners rather than just spouses and former spouses.
It also expands background checks on people between the ages of 18 and 21 seeking to buy a gun.
The National Rifle Association says it opposes the bill.
Who cares if the NRA opposed the bill, they don't directly vote on legislation. And of course they oppose it... What else would you expect from them? They're a special interest group.
This bill will have minimal impact in preventing shootings and protecting our nations kids.
Disagree.
“In addition, the bill expands an existing law that prevents people convicted of domestic abuse from owning a gun to include dating partners rather than just spouses and former spouses.”
Yep, and those yout's are not smart enough to turn the TV off to look at history and educate themselves...
Reality is that Trump did more for gun control that Obama before him and Biden since. But MSNBC won't tell you that, they'll tell you how much the NRA gave to the evil GOP...I wonder what they'd think if they knew Trump wanted to send the National Guard to Chicago to curb gun violence but Lightfoot kept them out of the city...
by doing what? It's never a good idea to put people not from an area into an area and expect some sort of peace to occur. You have to have people from those areas establishing relationships. If not, it looks like an occupation and resentment brews. This occurs all over the world.
I think the national guard has its uses but unless there was an active civil war/gun battle going on, the national guard could only make things worse (or better for a very short period of time).
Tell me you don’t know what the National Guard is without telling me you don’t know what the National Guard is
by doing what? It's never a good idea to put people not from an area into an area and expect some sort of peace to occur. You have to have people from those areas establishing relationships. If not, it looks like an occupation and resentment brews. This occurs all over the world.
I think the national guard has its uses but unless there was an active civil war/gun battle going on, the national guard could only make things worse (or better for a very short period of time).
Tell me you don’t know what the National Guard is without telling me you don’t know what the National Guard is
oh right, never mind, sending in the national guard into the ghetto would actually make things better, not worse! great point!
oh right, never mind, sending in the national guard into the ghetto would actually make things better, not worse! great point!
“Ghetto”? Racist much?
But yeah, the 26,000 National Guard troops sent to DC on January 6th sure did make things worse.
Yep, not surprising they made things worse considering all the people who lived in the federal government Capitol neighborhood that hated seeing the national guard presence.