This isn't about tax laws, stop moving the goalposts. This is about reporting laws that he is required as a member of SCOTUS to follow. He is required to report any sale of property of $1K or more. Doesn't matter one bit if it is sold as a loss.
Lol…I have to fill out an OGE every year and don’t have to report any losses in real estate, or any of my real estate holding if they don’t produce income.
It’s cute that you think you know anything at all.
Doesn't fucking matter. He is required by law to disclose any kind of property sale over $1K. Doesn't fucking matter if it is a loss or what. Tax laws have absolutely nothing to do with it.
This is a completely separate reporting protocol that they are legally required to go through as members of SCOTUS. Stop trying to make this about taxes. It is not about taxes. Not at all. It doesn't matter who does his taxes. Just because this news came out right around tax time doesn't mean this is about taxes.
SCOTUS disclosure protocols are absolutely something completely different and unrelated to taxes. Get that through your fucking retarded skull.
"Too often, we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." - JFK
"First Thoughts are the everyday thoughts. Everyone has those. Second Thoughts are the thoughts you think about the way you think. People who enjoy thinking have those. Third Thoughts are thoughts that watch the world and think all by themselves. They’re rare, and often troublesome."
Lol…I have to fill out an OGE every year and don’t have to report any losses in real estate, or any of my real estate holding if they don’t produce income.
It’s cute that you think you know anything at all.
Doesn't fucking matter. He is required by law to disclose any kind of property sale over $1K. Doesn't fucking matter if it is a loss or what. Tax laws have absolutely nothing to do with it.
This is a completely separate reporting protocol that they are legally required to go through as members of SCOTUS. Stop trying to make this about taxes. It is not about taxes. Not at all. It doesn't matter who does his taxes. Just because this news came out right around tax time doesn't mean this is about taxes.
SCOTUS disclosure protocols are absolutely something completely different and unrelated to taxes. Get that through your fucking retarded skull.
No he isn’t. He sold at a loss, he’s not required to report any real estate losses or any real estate deals unless they earn a profit
This isn’t about taxes, this is about government financial disclosures…in an OGE form.
I have a top secret clearance, so I have to report every stock I own and all of my income…but if I sell a property at a loss, like I just did in 2020, I do not have to report that on my OGE. I reported it in my taxes because it’s a tax break though.
Supreme Court Justices don’t have to report what I do
Last Edit: Apr 17, 2023 18:42:10 GMT -8 by bemaisgoat
You’re not a Supreme Court justice; what you have to disclose and what a Supreme Court justice has to disclose are not the same, retard.
Yep…I have to disclose a whole lot more than a Supreme Court Justice.
Yay for you? Doesn't matter here. Stop moving the goalposts.
"Too often, we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." - JFK
"First Thoughts are the everyday thoughts. Everyone has those. Second Thoughts are the thoughts you think about the way you think. People who enjoy thinking have those. Third Thoughts are thoughts that watch the world and think all by themselves. They’re rare, and often troublesome."
Post by EPIC Sir Tinley on Apr 18, 2023 4:38:35 GMT -8
Yes, I get it. Porter is among the most pathetically dumb in congress but she does shine the spotlight on those insanely thirsty for power in a one Party fascist state.
He was called out on it and is submitting an amendment.
That amendment will cost the government because they will have to pay Thomas
Thomas will be fine
You're missing the point. This has nothing (zero/zip/nada) to do with Thomas. This is about time/control. Much of the leftist, one Party state agenda violates the Constitution. To overcome that the left requires Pro-America, Pro-Constitution judges outnumbered by leftist, activist judges. The problem is time. With the disaster of the Biden term, retaining the White House is doubtful at best. That gives a small window to replace Thomas with an activist.
And there's no fuckin' way in hell they permit a Repub to replace Thomas with a much younger Thomas. The entire Thomas attack vanishes the instant a repub is sworn in to office.
n 2008, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas decided to send his teenage grandnephew to Hidden Lake Academy, a private boarding school in the foothills of northern Georgia. The boy, Mark Martin, was far from home. For the previous decade, he had lived with the justice and his wife in the suburbs of Washington, D.C. Thomas had taken legal custody of Martin when he was 6 years old and had recently told an interviewer he was “raising him as a son.”
Tuition at the boarding school ran more than $6,000 a month. But Thomas did not cover the bill. A bank statement for the school from July 2009, buried in unrelated court filings, shows the source of Martin’s tuition payment for that month: the company of billionaire real estate magnate Harlan Crow.
n 2008, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas decided to send his teenage grandnephew to Hidden Lake Academy, a private boarding school in the foothills of northern Georgia. The boy, Mark Martin, was far from home. For the previous decade, he had lived with the justice and his wife in the suburbs of Washington, D.C. Thomas had taken legal custody of Martin when he was 6 years old and had recently told an interviewer he was “raising him as a son.”
Tuition at the boarding school ran more than $6,000 a month. But Thomas did not cover the bill. A bank statement for the school from July 2009, buried in unrelated court filings, shows the source of Martin’s tuition payment for that month: the company of billionaire real estate magnate Harlan Crow.
Boston Globe
It is concerning that a long standing Supreme Court Justice has been propped up by a Billionaire donor for so long. Everything that has come out about Thomas puts every single one of his decisions into question. How many of his opinions and votes have been influenced by Crow? I would imagine a lot of them. A Billionaire like him would not do these many personal favors and give this lifestyle to Thomas if he wasn't a Supreme Court Justice, and he definitely wouldn't be doing this kind of stuff and handing out this kind of money and favors if he wasn't getting anything in return. That's just the facts of life of how billionaires live, not even touching on the fact that Crow has a well documented Nazi fascination. Clarence Thomas no longer has any integrity as a justice.
"Too often, we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." - JFK
"First Thoughts are the everyday thoughts. Everyone has those. Second Thoughts are the thoughts you think about the way you think. People who enjoy thinking have those. Third Thoughts are thoughts that watch the world and think all by themselves. They’re rare, and often troublesome."
It is concerning that a long standing Supreme Court Justice has been propped up by a Billionaire donor for so long. Everything that has come out about Thomas puts every single one of his decisions into question. How many of his opinions and votes have been influenced by Crow? I would imagine a lot of them. A Billionaire like him would not do these many personal favors and give this lifestyle to Thomas if he wasn't a Supreme Court Justice, and he definitely wouldn't be doing this kind of stuff and handing out this kind of money and favors if he wasn't getting anything in return. That's just the facts of life of how billionaires live, not even touching on the fact that Crow has a well documented Nazi fascination. Clarence Thomas no longer has any integrity as a justice.
What personal favors does Crow need and what did he get in return? Crow doesn't have a well documented nazi fascination, you should actually see his historical collection. Nazi piece is tiny. He does collect everything.
the source of Martin’s tuition payment for that month: the company of billionaire real estate magnate Harlan Crow.
Don't worry, Harlan absolutely hates Trump. All good!
I want to share a true, personal story to give you a bit of perspective.
I led a team that produced a special purpose "appliance". We built the software and some customer hardware. We integrated off the shelf components like storage arrays, processing blades, networking etc. When we delivered the "appliance" into a customer lab, all they had to do was plug it in, configure a few parameters and it was off and running.
Sales vendors were always in our building meeting with manufacturing, engineering, finance, etc.
I was called to an unscheduled meeting with the CEO and leaders of other functions. We were there to decide whether a guy named Ken from procurement should be fired. Ken had accepted a large, plasma TV from a vendor. Someone asked what Ken provided in return. The CEO said, it doesn't matter what, if anything, Ken did for the vendor.
The mere perception of impropriety was cause for termination. Ken had a duty to keep protect the best interest of the company. Ken's actions were in conflict with his overarching responsibility.
We were there to learn a lesson, not to decide.
Ken was terminated.
This was happening in many businesses including the government.
The U.S. government now has a standard policy for receving gifts. Many compainies have copied it or drafted their own.
Clarence Thomas would be immediately terminated if standard U.S. government policy applied to him.
Clarence Thomas would be immediately terminated if standard U.S. government policy applied to him.
So, personal anecdote aside. What laws or rules did Justice Thomas break?
Its obvious lots of racists on the left hate Thomas, he doesn't fit their preconceived notions and he can define 'woman'. To bad for them, they're pieces of shit.
Clarence Thomas would be immediately terminated if standard U.S. government policy applied to him.
So, personal anecdote aside. What laws or rules did Justice Thomas break?
Its obvious lots of racists on the left hate Thomas, he doesn't fit their preconceived notions and he can define 'woman'. To bad for them, they're pieces of shit.
you're quoting Ron stating "if"; which means that he didn't break rules/laws. New rules are being made for supreme court justices in terms of financial disclosures, which I assume you are against.
It's also obvious what this shows and what people are not ok with. They do not want the highest courts in the land being courted (given money) by billionaires.