I'm not familiar with this person. Googled her and just saw she criticized transgender athletes for competing in women's sports. What's your justification for thinking it's good that she got assaulted?
Bigots should never be allowed to be comfortable being bigots.
I'm not going to pretend like sports is the end of the fucking world like conservatives would like to pretend it is.
I had girls as teammates in both baseball and football and that was 13 years ago. Why is that an issue now who plays where? We have mouth breathers accusing cis gender women of being trans just because they're bigger. So why is that exactly?
Ahh, so someone is a bigot for not being ok with men, who identify as women, competing in women's athletics while having a clear biological advantage? That's pretty fucking stupid if that's what you think.
You're OK with assaulting someone if their opinion is different than yours. That's a very, very dangerous position to take.
No I'm okay with assaulting bigots. Big difference. We can have a respectable conversation on trade or whatever, and agree to disagree when opinions don't align.
On this topic however there's nothing to discuss. That's cut and dry.
Bigots should never be allowed to be comfortable being bigots.
I'm not going to pretend like sports is the end of the fucking world like conservatives would like to pretend it is.
I had girls as teammates in both baseball and football and that was 13 years ago. Why is that an issue now who plays where? We have mouth breathers accusing cis gender women of being trans just because they're bigger. So why is that exactly?
Ahh, so someone is a bigot for not being ok with men, who identify as women, competing in women's athletics while having a clear biological advantage? That's pretty fucking stupid if that's what you think.
Are you even capable of understanding what those biological differences are?
You're OK with assaulting someone if their opinion is different than yours. That's a very, very dangerous position to take.
No I'm okay with assaulting bigots. Big difference. We can have a respectable conversation on trade or whatever, and agree to disagree when opinions don't align.
On this topic however there's nothing to discuss. That's cut and dry.
Ahh, so someone is a bigot for not being ok with men, who identify as women, competing in women's athletics while having a clear biological advantage? That's pretty fucking stupid if that's what you think.
Are you even capable of understanding what those biological differences are?
You're OK with assaulting someone if their opinion is different than yours. That's a very, very dangerous position to take.
No I'm okay with assaulting bigots. Big difference. We can have a respectable conversation on trade or whatever, and agree to disagree when opinions don't align.
On this topic however there's nothing to discuss. That's cut and dry.
Oh, its far from "cut and dry"
A biological woman, competing in a sport for biological women, doesn't think its fair to have to compete against a biological male. And that worthy of being assaulted in your opinion.
The only thing that is "cut and dry" is that your opinion that people should be assaulted if their opinion differs from yours is a very very dangerous position to take.
No I'm okay with assaulting bigots. Big difference. We can have a respectable conversation on trade or whatever, and agree to disagree when opinions don't align.
On this topic however there's nothing to discuss. That's cut and dry.
Oh, its far from "cut and dry"
A biological woman, competing in a sport for biological women, doesn't think its fair to have to compete against a biological male. And that worthy of being assaulted in your opinion.
The only thing that is "cut and dry" is that your opinion that people should be assaulted if their opinion differs from yours is a very very dangerous position to take.
Oh you thought that was an opinion? No that's the reality. Deal with it, sports isn't all that important to disenfranchise someone.
No I'm okay with assaulting bigots. Big difference. We can have a respectable conversation on trade or whatever, and agree to disagree when opinions don't align.
On this topic however there's nothing to discuss. That's cut and dry.
A biological woman, competing in a sport for biological women, doesn't think its fair to have to compete against a biological male. And that worthy of being assaulted in your opinion.
The only thing that is "cut and dry" is that your opinion that people should be assaulted if their opinion differs from yours is a very very dangerous position to take.
Oh you thought that was an opinion? No that's the reality. Deal with it, sports isn't all that important to disenfranchise someone.
Yes, it is an opinion despite your protests otherwise.
Are you even capable of understanding what those biological differences are?
Yes. Clearly, you aren't.
Clearly you don't.
Your first failure is believing that "identifying" as a gender is a choice. It's not anymore of a choice than you believing you're a male. It's not anymore of a choice than a gay person being gay.
Your first failure is believing that "identifying" as a gender is a choice. It's not anymore of a choice than you believing you're a male. It's not anymore of a choice than a gay person being gay.
Lol, holy shit.
And what does that have to do with human anatomy and biological differences?
Your first failure is believing that "identifying" as a gender is a choice. It's not anymore of a choice than you believing you're a male. It's not anymore of a choice than a gay person being gay.
Lol, holy shit.
And what does that have to do with human anatomy and biological differences?
We don't differentiate between sexes even when an individual might be significantly bigger and more athletic, outside of sports with weight classes. So what's your point?
A penis or vegina is a dogshit way to differentiate athletic ability. What of the people that have both?
What is a "better" way? Claiming you "identify" as one or the other?
You mentioned "reality" earlier. So why is it that you are ignoring the reality of biology?
How does you ignoring the genetic influences and hormones that causes people to be transsexual any better? And why should sports be considered significant enough to bar someone from participating?
And what does that have to do with human anatomy and biological differences?
We don't differentiate between sexes even when an individual might be significantly bigger and more athletic, outside of sports with weight classes. So what's your point?
Well, we're talking about sports. Are you implying that because swimming doesn't have weight classes that it somehow justifies whatever it is you're trying to say?
Why don't women who are similar in weight/height play in the NBA, MLB, MLS, etc? Why don't female fighters fight against men in the same weight class in MMA, boxing, kickboxing, etc? Surely it's not because they would be at a disadvantage.